Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Govind Nanda vs Edan Leshem Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nanda vs Leshem analysis and find out who is favored!
Govind Nanda vs Edan Leshem Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Nanda 1 - 0 Leshem
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nanda has won 33.33% of points on their second serve, while Leshem has won 44.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nanda, in recent form, has won 36.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Leshem has won 54.7%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 34.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nanda has saved 25% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Leshem has saved 48.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nanda has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 1), with Leshem winning 50% (W/L 6/ 6) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nanda has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 28/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 8). Leshem has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 265/ 163), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Nanda has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 1), where as Leshem has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 5/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nanda winning 1 times and Leshem being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nanda winning 2 and Leshem winning 1. The last match between Nanda and Leshem was at the M25 Tulsa, 16-06-2021, First, Hard with Govind Nanda getting the victory 4-6 7-6(6) 4-0 ret..
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nanda and Leshem have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nanda winning 0 times and Leshem 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nanda winning 1, and Leshem 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nanda has played against opponents with an average rank of 681 while Leshem has played against players with an average rank of 68.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nanda has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Leshem has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nanda has converted 66.67% of breakpoint opportunities, and Leshem has converted 46.34% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
835
Rank
339
High
23
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
899
Rank
249
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
58% (112-81)
Career Total W/L
58% (308-221)
0% (0-1)
YTD W/L
20% (1-4)
$56,390
Career Prize Money
$26,870
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Govind Nanda vs Edan Leshem For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Nanda VS Leshem
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Govind Nanda | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:44:0 | 2:44:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 47% (40/85) | 53% (48/90) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (27/40) | 58% (28/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (19/45) | 38% (16/42) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 63% (5/8) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (46/90) | 46% (39/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 7-6(6) 4-0 ret. |
Stats 
Govind Nanda
Player
Edan Leshem
47%
(
40 of
85)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
4
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
42%
(
19 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
39 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
90)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Govind Nanda | Edan Leshem |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 27% (3/8) |
| Games Win/Loss | 25% (4/12) | 47% (49/55) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 3 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.29 |
| DFs Total | 1 | 15 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:38:6 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 681 | 95.2 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (29/47) | 66% (227/343) |
| 1st Serve W% | 48% (14/29) | 59% (133/227) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 33% (6/18) | 45% (52/116) |
| BPs Won% Total | 67% (2/3) | 46% (19/41) |
| Return Pts W% | 34% (15/44) | 42% (128/305) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Govind Nanda Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Liam Draxl
Player
Govind Nanda
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Kotzen
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
Govind Nanda
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Huzaifa Abdul Rehman
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Thomas Brown
61%
(
61 of
100)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
37 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kyrian Jacquet
Player
Govind Nanda
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Isaiah Strode
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
41 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
95
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Govind Nanda
Player
Aidan Kim
59%
(
43 of
73)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
9
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
39 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Federico Agustin Gomez
Player
Govind Nanda
47%
(
29 of
62)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
90%
(
26 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Segura
Player
Govind Nanda
63%
(
57 of
90)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
44%
(
40 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
95
Total Points Won
85
|
2-6 7-6(3) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Edan Leshem Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Vasco Leote Prata
Player
Edan Leshem
58%
(
50 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
41%
(
35 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
93
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Drew Van Orderlain
Player
Edan Leshem
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
21 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bruno Kuzuhara
Player
Edan Leshem
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Kozlov
Player
Edan Leshem
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
36 of
63)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Gonzalo Lama
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
38%
(
17 of
45)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Edan Leshem
56%
(
28 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
52
Total Points Won
50
|
5-7 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Jordan Hasson
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
9
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
46
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Emile Hudd
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
61
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Edan Leshem
Player
Martyn Pawelski
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
49%
(
41 of
84)
1
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
43)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
29 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Edan Leshem
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
41%
(
22 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Nanda Vs Leshem Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Nanda are available here and Leshem photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
